Move it or lose it.
Regular physical activity is shown to decrease the risk of conditions like diabetes and heart disease by 25% or more, and improve primary cardiovascular health risk factors including cholesterol, blood pressure and BMI.1,2 Yet 4 in 5 U.S. adults do not meet recommended physical activity levels, elevating healthcare costs by 11%.3,4
This report looks at the multi-year impacts of engagement in regular exercise through an employer-provided fitness benefit on health outcomes.5 This research examines 2,450 Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) commercially insured members who used their benefit over a four-year period and measures changes in health outcomes, compared to non participants. Outcomes include overall health via the BCBS Health Index, chronic condition prevalence and healthcare costs.
REGULAR EXERCISE IMPROVES OVERALL HEALTH...
Members who consistently exercised were 1 point healthier on average, which translates to an 8% reduction in the impact of health conditions that could lower their overall health. This impact was measured by the BCBS Health Index between years three and four of the study.6
...CONTRIBUTES TO SLOWER GROWTH OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONDITIONS
Prevalence of major depression grew 2% slower among millennials who regularly exercise.
...REDUCES CHRONIC CONDITIONS
Chronic conditions like hypertension and diabetes grew 2-3 % slower among members who regularly exercise.
...AND LOWERS HEALTHCARE COSTS.
Members who exercise regularly saw lower healthcare costs – approximately $4,438 less over four years.
Impact on Overall Health
The result of regular exercise was measured by performing a trended cohort analysis looking at differences in health and healthcare costs over a four-year period.
When comparing the BCBS Health Index of the program participants and the matched population, program participants who regularly use the fitness benefit saw a slower decline in their average BCBS Health Index7 (see Figure 1). In other words, BCBS members who used their fitness benefit on a regular basis did a better job of maintaining their overall health than did members without the benefit.
The cohort was established among members who maintained their fitness benefit for four years and used the benefit five or more times a month in the last two years of the study. A matched cohort of people who did not enroll in the fitness benefit was then developed based on gender, age and BCBS Health Index during the first year of the program. The overall health of the two cohorts were compared over a four year period using the BCBS Health Index.8 (See Methodology for further explanation of the matching process.)
Regular exercisers saw a slower growth rate in chronic conditions compared to the matched cohort. All age groups studied saw slower growth in hypertension among regular exercisers. Growth in diabetes slowed among Generation X and baby boomers while millennials saw slower growth in major depression.
Impact on Cost
Regular exercise also has a positive impact on healthcare costs. When compared with the matched cohort, regular exercisers had lower healthcare costs — over $4,000 less during the four-year period. (See Figure 2). These lower costs spanned each age group, with Gen Xers and baby boomers seeing the largest reduction in costs.
Regular exercise over a sustained period of time has a measurable and positive impact on physical and mental health, as shown by the more favorable Health Index seen among the regular exercise group compared to the matched population, as measured by the BCBS Health Index. The wellness benefit program studied resulted in significant cost savings and ultimately a healthier workforce for the employer.
Blue365® and Tivity Health® have been working together to offer discounted gym memberships to more than 10,000 gyms nationwide since 2013.9 Currently, there are over 220,000 BCBS members who take advantage of this membership through the Blue365 program. This report studied participants who visited the gym as a way to track those who exercised and leveraged data from this population to report on the overall benefits of regular exercise.
The BCBS Health Index
The measure of overall health used in this report is the BCBS Health Index, which is a quantification of the health of populations by a score between zero and 100. A score of 100 indicates a population’s greatest potential lifespan in the absence of disability or premature death. Health impacts, which are health conditions that cause morbidity and mortality, reduce the optimum BCBS Health Index.
Cohorts and Matching
The cohort analysis of regular program participants was limited to federal employees with BCBS coverage who had a paid membership in the program for four consecutive years and who averaged more than four gym visits per month in the last two years of that period. Regular program participants were matched one-to-one with a matched population on gender, age, and BCBS Health Index score at year one of the program. The matched FEP groups were also individuals who had four consecutive years of BCBS Health Index data from 2014 through 2017. The BCBS Health Index were estimated at each of the four years for the Regular Use, Limited Use, and each of the two matched groups. The average Health Index decreases as a population ages. Tracking the BCBS Health Index over time, we would expect to see all groups have a decrease in their average BCBS Health Index across the four-year period.
Costs are represented by average per member per year (PMPY) costs through the four-year analysis. Conditions are analyzed through a prevalence rate of specific conditions (hypertension, type II diabetes and major depressive disorder). The change in prevalence from year one to year four indicates a difference between Tivity Health gym members and the matched population. All differences across the four years were statistically assessed to determine whether the difference over time was due to random variation in the data. The standard errors of these differences were estimated from the pooled variance of the differences. Standardized z-scores were calculated and then used to derive the one-sided prevalence probability that the difference between the groups would be equal to or less than zero. For the difference in means, a t-score was used. These probabilities are then represented as a percent chance that the result is not due to variance in the data.10
- Kyu HH et al. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. BMJ. 2016.
- Myers, Jonathan. Exercise and Cardiovascular Health. Circulation. 2003
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013
- Carlson SA et al. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Progress in Cardiovascular Disease. 2015
- Tivity Health Fitness Your Way.
- For additional information on the Health Index and methodology, read more.
- This matched population is not a “control” group in that they have not enrolled in the gym benefit program (at least for three continuous years) despite the program being available to them during the study period. They are matched to the FEP program participants on age, gender, and initial health index score.
- BCBS Health Index analyses are presented only for the Regular Use group and their matched FEP group. The same analyses were performed for the Limited Use group, but improvements in health were not found.
- Blue 365 gym membership offer information
- The 2017 difference has a 92% chance of not being due to data variability. For details of statistical testing, see Methodology.